User login

You are here

Home

Is Global Warming just Alarmist Propaganda?

global warming

I love and cherish the Earth as much as the next guy. Probably more so, I recycle, I hardly ever drive, I own an old car, rather than depleting the Earth and creating more pollution with the creation of a new car. I don't use pesticides or insecticides, I grow my own food (which limits pollution from industrial agriculture and gas used to ship food). I do quite a bit to make my footprint on the Earth as small as possible.

Another thing that I love and cherish is the truth. I constantly seek truth and all the evidence I have found points to Man Made Global warming (Now called "Climate Change") being alarmist propaganda. The latest peer reviewed study to blow holes in the whole Global Warming debate was conducted by none other than our very own NASA. These new findings are extremely important and should dramatically alter the global warming debate. Here is a link to the story. (http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism...)

The jist of it is, a decade long NASA study has shown that far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.

This coincides with science and scientist everywhere.

When you combine scientific opinion, with the NASA study and the "Climate-gate" scandal of 2009, it becomes clear that we have been lied too. Either some well meaning people wanted to stop pollution (who doesn't?) and decided the ends justify the means or some not so well meaning people wanted to make a lot of money through scaring the public. The truth is most likely a combination of the two.

Like I said above. I love the Earth and I do what I can to help it remain healthy for future generations but I do not believe we should be lied to.

I have heard that you can judge a person by their actions. One of the biggest proponents of Global Warming was Al Gore. Aside from his snuff film "An Inconvenient Truth" which has been documented as full of errors (or lies?) he is also the founder of a a venture capital company that has invested about $1 billion in companies that just might make a bundle should cap-and-trade become law.

Also he has a home in Nashville that boasts a $30,000 monthly utility bill and another mansion on the coast-line in California.

I would never fault a person for doing well and I will let you decide if he is a con-man or not but it seems to me, if he believed in the nonsense he has put out as fact, he would not spend $30,000 a month using electricity supplied by a coal plant in one house while buying a seaside mansion elsewhere. Isn't he the person that warned us all of the rising sea levels global warming is supposedly going to cause in the near future?

This is not about Republican vs Democrat ( I think both parties are full of lies, I vote for people, not parties) This is about Truth vs Lies.